X-Ray Safety: Is X-Ray Radiation Safe?

Medically reviewed | Last reviewed: | Evidence level: 1A
X-ray is a common and very safe medical examination. While X-rays use ionizing radiation, the risk of harm from diagnostic X-ray radiation is extremely low. The medical benefit of accurate diagnosis through X-ray imaging far outweighs the minimal radiation risk. Modern X-ray equipment and techniques ensure radiation doses are kept as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA principle).
📅 Updated:
⏱️ Reading time: 12 minutes
Written and reviewed by iMedic Medical Editorial Team | Specialists in radiology and medical physics

📊 Quick facts about X-ray safety

Chest X-ray dose
0.1 mSv
= 10 days background
Dental X-ray dose
0.005 mSv
extremely low
Annual background
2-3 mSv
natural radiation
Radiation after X-ray
None
no radiation remains
Pregnancy safety
Very low risk
with precautions
ICD-10 code
Z01.89
SNOMED CT: 168537006

💡 The most important things you need to know

  • X-rays are very safe: The radiation dose from most diagnostic X-rays is extremely low, equivalent to a few days of natural background radiation
  • No radiation remains: After an X-ray examination, no radiation stays in your body - it passes through immediately
  • Benefit outweighs risk: X-rays are only performed when the medical benefit of diagnosis greatly exceeds the minimal radiation risk
  • Pregnancy precautions: Always inform staff if you are or might be pregnant - most X-rays are still safe with appropriate precautions
  • Children are protected: Special pediatric protocols ensure children receive the lowest possible radiation doses
  • Modern technology: Today's X-ray equipment uses digital technology that significantly reduces radiation exposure compared to older systems

Is X-Ray Safe?

Yes, X-ray is a very safe medical examination. The radiation dose from common X-rays is extremely low - a chest X-ray exposes you to about 0.1 mSv, equivalent to approximately 10 days of natural background radiation. The benefit of accurate diagnosis far outweighs any minimal radiation risk.

X-ray imaging is one of the most commonly performed medical procedures worldwide, with billions of examinations conducted annually. When you undergo an X-ray examination, radiation passes through your body to create images that help doctors detect injuries, diseases, and abnormalities. Understanding the safety of this technology can help alleviate concerns and allow you to make informed decisions about your healthcare.

The radiation used in diagnostic X-rays is a form of electromagnetic energy similar to visible light, but with higher energy that allows it to penetrate body tissues. While this ionizing radiation can theoretically cause cellular damage, the doses used in medical imaging are carefully controlled and extremely low. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) both confirm that the benefits of medically justified X-ray examinations far outweigh any theoretical risks.

Modern X-ray technology has evolved significantly over the past decades. Digital radiography systems now require substantially lower radiation doses than traditional film-based systems while producing clearer, more detailed images. Healthcare facilities follow strict protocols based on the ALARA principle - keeping radiation doses "As Low As Reasonably Achievable" while still obtaining the diagnostic information needed for your care.

Why doctors order X-rays

X-ray imaging enables healthcare providers to see inside your body without surgery. This non-invasive diagnostic tool is essential for detecting fractures, infections, tumors, arthritis, blocked blood vessels, and many other conditions. Without X-ray technology, many serious conditions might go undiagnosed, leading to delayed treatment and potentially worse outcomes.

The decision to perform an X-ray is never taken lightly. Medical professionals carefully weigh the diagnostic benefit against any potential risk before recommending the procedure. In most cases, the information gained from an X-ray is crucial for making accurate diagnoses and developing effective treatment plans. Not performing a medically necessary X-ray examination could pose a greater risk than the minimal radiation exposure involved.

Key point about X-ray safety:

The radiation from a single chest X-ray (0.1 mSv) is equivalent to about 10 days of natural background radiation that everyone receives from the environment. Our bodies are equipped to repair minor cellular damage from such low doses, and no measurable health effects have been demonstrated from diagnostic X-ray exposures at these levels.

Can X-Rays Cause Cancer or Other Damage?

While radiation exposure can theoretically increase cancer risk at high doses, the extremely low doses from diagnostic X-rays have not been shown to cause measurable health effects. Large epidemiological studies have found no detectable increase in cancer rates among people who have had diagnostic X-rays.

Understanding radiation risk requires context. Radiation is measured in millisieverts (mSv), and we all receive natural background radiation of approximately 2-3 mSv per year from cosmic rays, the ground, and naturally occurring radioactive elements in our environment and even our own bodies. Our cells have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to repair damage from this constant low-level radiation exposure.

The radiation doses from common diagnostic X-rays are remarkably small compared to both natural background radiation and doses known to cause health effects. For perspective, the Japanese atomic bomb survivors - whose experiences form the foundation of our understanding of radiation risks - received whole-body doses of 100 mSv or more. This is 1,000 times higher than a typical chest X-ray. Even in this highly exposed population, cancer risks only became statistically detectable at doses above approximately 100 mSv.

In rare cases, radiation from X-rays can cause cellular damage that leads to cell changes. These cellular changes typically repair themselves naturally. While it is theoretically possible for such changes to eventually contribute to cancer development many years later, this is extremely uncommon with diagnostic imaging doses. It is important to understand that cancer rarely has a single cause, and the contribution of diagnostic X-rays to cancer risk, if any, is too small to measure.

Understanding radiation dose comparisons

Putting radiation exposure in perspective helps illustrate why diagnostic X-rays are considered safe. The table below compares common X-ray procedures to equivalent periods of natural background radiation, helping you understand just how low these medical exposures truly are.

Common X-ray procedures and their radiation doses compared to natural background
Procedure Typical Dose (mSv) Equivalent Background Radiation Risk Level
Dental X-ray 0.005 mSv 1 day Negligible
Chest X-ray 0.1 mSv 10 days Negligible
Arm/Leg X-ray 0.001 mSv Less than 1 day Negligible
Abdominal X-ray 0.7 mSv 4 months Very low
CT scan (head) 2 mSv 8 months Low
CT scan (chest) 7 mSv 2-3 years Low
CT scan (abdomen) 10 mSv 3-4 years Low

As the table demonstrates, most standard X-rays deliver radiation doses equivalent to just days or weeks of natural background exposure. Even CT scans, which use higher doses, remain well below levels associated with measurable health risks. The medical community continues to develop new techniques and technologies to further reduce radiation doses while maintaining image quality.

What Should I Know Before Having an X-Ray?

Before an X-ray, know that clear guidelines govern when examinations should be performed, doses are always minimized, no radiation remains in your body afterward, and you can ask healthcare staff any questions about the procedure. Most common X-rays use very low radiation doses.

Being informed about X-ray procedures can help reduce anxiety and ensure you receive the best possible care. Healthcare systems worldwide have established comprehensive guidelines and protocols to ensure X-ray examinations are performed safely and only when medically necessary. Understanding these safeguards can provide reassurance about the safety of your examination.

Every X-ray procedure is carefully planned to deliver the minimum radiation dose necessary to obtain diagnostically useful images. Radiographers (the technologists who perform X-rays) are specifically trained in radiation protection techniques. They position patients precisely, use appropriate exposure settings for each body part and patient size, and employ shielding when beneficial.

Modern digital X-ray systems automatically optimize exposure parameters, reducing both radiation dose and the need for repeat examinations due to image quality issues. Quality assurance programs ensure equipment is regularly calibrated and maintained to deliver consistent, safe radiation doses.

Important facts to remember

  • Clear guidelines exist: Strict regulations govern when X-ray examinations should and should not be performed, ensuring they are only done when medically justified
  • Doses are minimized: Every examination is tailored to use the lowest radiation dose that will produce diagnostic images
  • No radiation remains: After an X-ray, the radiation passes through your body immediately - there is no lingering radiation in your tissues
  • Doses vary by examination: Different procedures require different amounts of radiation - many common X-rays (chest, dental, extremities) use extremely low doses
  • Ask questions: Healthcare staff are happy to explain the procedure and address any concerns you may have about radiation exposure

Radiation is a natural part of our environment, present in cosmic rays from space, the ground beneath us, and even radioactive elements that occur naturally in our bodies. Our cells have evolved mechanisms to repair minor damage from this constant background exposure. The radiation from medical X-rays works similarly to this natural radiation, just in carefully controlled, brief exposures.

What to tell the healthcare staff:

Always inform the radiographer if you are pregnant, might be pregnant, or are breastfeeding. Also mention any previous recent X-rays or CT scans, especially if performed at different facilities. This information helps healthcare providers make the best decisions about your care and optimize radiation protection.

Are X-Rays Safe for Children?

X-rays are safe for children when medically necessary, though children are somewhat more sensitive to radiation than adults because they are still growing. Healthcare providers use specialized pediatric protocols that significantly reduce radiation doses while maintaining image quality. The Image Gently Alliance provides guidelines to protect children.

Children require special consideration when it comes to medical imaging because their tissues are still developing and dividing more rapidly than adult tissues. This makes them potentially more sensitive to radiation effects. However, when an X-ray is medically indicated, the diagnostic benefit typically far outweighs the small radiation risk, especially when pediatric-specific techniques are employed.

Healthcare facilities that image children follow specialized protocols developed by organizations like the Image Gently Alliance, an international coalition dedicated to reducing radiation exposure in pediatric imaging. These protocols ensure that children receive only the radiation necessary to obtain diagnostic images, accounting for their smaller body size and specific imaging needs.

Pediatric radiology has made tremendous advances in reducing radiation doses for children. Techniques include using child-sized exposure parameters rather than adult settings, employing modern digital technology that requires less radiation, limiting the imaging area to only what is diagnostically necessary, and avoiding unnecessary repeat examinations through proper positioning and patient management.

How children are protected during X-rays

Multiple safeguards are in place to protect children during medical imaging. Radiographers receive specialized training in pediatric imaging techniques, learning how to work with children of different ages to minimize motion that might require repeat exposures. Child-friendly environments help reduce anxiety, leading to better cooperation and fewer repeat examinations.

Parents can often stay with their children during X-ray examinations, providing comfort and helping the child stay still. When parents remain in the room, they are provided with protective lead aprons or positioned away from the direct X-ray beam. Discussing the examination beforehand can help children understand what to expect and reduce anxiety.

Preparing children for X-rays:

Help your child understand what will happen during the X-ray by explaining it simply and positively. Emphasize that the examination is quick, painless, and will help the doctor understand what is happening inside their body. Bringing a favorite toy or comfort item can help younger children feel more at ease.

Is X-Ray Safe During Pregnancy or While Breastfeeding?

Most X-rays pose very low risk during pregnancy, especially examinations that do not directly image the abdomen or pelvis. When pelvic X-rays are necessary, techniques minimize fetal exposure. Always inform healthcare staff if you are or might be pregnant. X-rays do not affect breast milk, so breastfeeding can continue normally after the examination.

The safety of X-rays during pregnancy depends largely on which part of the body is being examined. X-rays of the head, arms, legs, chest (with proper shielding), and teeth pose very minimal risk to the developing fetus because the radiation beam does not directly involve the uterus. The scattered radiation that might reach the fetus from these examinations is extremely low.

When X-ray examination of the abdomen, pelvis, or lower back is medically necessary during pregnancy, healthcare providers use several strategies to protect the fetus. These include carefully collimating (restricting) the X-ray beam to the smallest area necessary, using the minimum required exposure settings, and shielding the uterus when possible. Even with direct fetal exposure, diagnostic X-ray doses remain far below levels associated with birth defects or developmental problems.

The International Commission on Radiological Protection has stated that fetal doses below 100 mSv should not be considered a reason for terminating a pregnancy. For context, even a CT scan of the pelvis - one of the higher-dose examinations - delivers a fetal dose of only about 25 mSv. Standard X-rays of the abdomen deliver fetal doses of around 1-2 mSv, well below any threshold of concern.

What if X-ray is essential during pregnancy?

Sometimes X-ray imaging is essential during pregnancy to diagnose conditions that could harm both mother and baby if left untreated. Examples include suspected bone fractures, severe abdominal conditions, or certain lung problems. In these situations, the risk of not diagnosing and treating the condition often far exceeds the minimal radiation risk to the fetus.

If you need an X-ray during pregnancy, healthcare providers will take every precaution to minimize fetal exposure while still obtaining the diagnostic information needed for your care. Alternative imaging methods like ultrasound or MRI may be considered when appropriate, though X-rays often remain the best choice for certain conditions.

X-rays and breastfeeding

X-ray radiation does not affect breast milk in any way. Radiation from X-rays does not make the mother or her milk radioactive. You can safely breastfeed immediately after having an X-ray examination without any concerns about radiation exposure to your baby. This applies to all standard X-ray procedures.

For pregnant or breastfeeding women:

Always inform healthcare staff about your pregnancy or potential pregnancy before any X-ray examination. This allows them to assess whether the examination is necessary, consider alternatives if appropriate, and optimize protection if the X-ray is needed. After having an X-ray, you can continue breastfeeding normally - the radiation does not affect breast milk.

What About X-Ray Guided Medical Procedures?

Some medical procedures use X-ray imaging (fluoroscopy) for real-time guidance, such as inserting catheters or placing stents. These procedures may involve higher radiation doses than standard X-rays, but side effects are uncommon. Healthcare staff will inform you about any potential skin effects to watch for after longer procedures.

Interventional radiology and fluoroscopy-guided procedures use X-ray imaging to help physicians see inside the body in real-time while performing minimally invasive treatments. Examples include cardiac catheterization, angioplasty, placing stents, draining fluid collections, and certain biopsies. These procedures often provide treatment options that would otherwise require major surgery.

Because these procedures may require prolonged imaging to guide instruments precisely within the body, radiation doses can be higher than standard diagnostic X-rays. However, the medical benefits of these minimally invasive procedures typically far outweigh the radiation risks. Modern fluoroscopy equipment includes many features to reduce radiation exposure, and interventional radiologists are trained in techniques to minimize patient dose while maintaining image quality.

In most cases, patients experience no side effects from the radiation used during interventional procedures. However, for particularly long or complex procedures involving high radiation doses, some patients may develop temporary skin effects in the area exposed to the X-ray beam. These effects, which might include redness, peeling, or itching, typically appear several weeks after the procedure and usually resolve on their own.

After an interventional procedure

Healthcare staff will always inform you about any symptoms to watch for after interventional procedures. If you undergo a procedure that involves higher radiation exposure, you may be given specific instructions about monitoring your skin in the treated area. Most patients experience no radiation-related effects at all.

If you do develop skin changes after an interventional procedure, it is important to contact the facility where you had the procedure. Most skin effects are mild and temporary, but healthcare providers can assess whether any treatment is needed and provide reassurance about what to expect.

What Types of X-Ray Examinations Exist?

Common types include chest X-rays, dental X-rays, bone X-rays, abdominal X-rays, and mammography. CT (computed tomography) scans are a specialized form using X-rays to create detailed cross-sectional images. Each type is optimized for specific diagnostic purposes with doses matched to the clinical need.

X-ray imaging encompasses a wide variety of examinations, each designed to visualize specific body structures or detect particular conditions. Understanding the different types can help you know what to expect when your doctor recommends a specific examination.

Plain radiography (standard X-rays)

Plain radiography is the most common form of X-ray imaging. It produces two-dimensional images using a single X-ray exposure. Common plain radiograph examinations include chest X-rays to evaluate the lungs and heart, bone X-rays to detect fractures and arthritis, dental X-rays for tooth and jaw problems, and abdominal X-rays to assess intestinal conditions.

These examinations use relatively low radiation doses and provide quick results. They are often the first imaging study ordered when doctors suspect certain conditions, as they are widely available, relatively inexpensive, and provide valuable diagnostic information.

Computed tomography (CT scans)

CT scanning uses X-rays to create detailed cross-sectional images of the body, providing much more anatomical detail than plain X-rays. The X-ray tube rotates around the patient while detectors measure radiation that passes through the body, and computers process this information to create detailed three-dimensional images.

CT scans use higher radiation doses than plain X-rays because they acquire multiple images from different angles. However, they are invaluable for diagnosing complex conditions, including cancers, internal injuries, blood clots, and detailed bone abnormalities. The diagnostic benefits of CT scans often significantly outweigh the radiation considerations.

Fluoroscopy

Fluoroscopy uses continuous X-ray imaging to create real-time moving images, similar to an X-ray "movie." This technique is used for barium studies (examining the digestive tract), joint injections, certain surgeries, and interventional procedures. Radiation doses vary depending on the length and complexity of the examination.

Mammography

Mammography is a specialized X-ray technique designed specifically for breast imaging. It uses relatively low X-ray doses and is highly effective at detecting breast cancer, often at early, treatable stages. The benefits of regular mammography screening for appropriate populations have been extensively documented.

Choosing the right imaging test:

Your doctor considers many factors when recommending imaging, including which test best answers the clinical question, the radiation dose involved, alternative options like ultrasound or MRI, and your individual health situation. Don't hesitate to ask why a particular test is recommended and whether alternatives might be appropriate.

How Is Radiation Exposure Minimized?

Radiation exposure is minimized through the ALARA principle (As Low As Reasonably Achievable), modern digital technology, proper equipment calibration, beam collimation, shielding when appropriate, and only performing examinations when medically justified. Quality control programs ensure consistent safety standards.

The medical imaging community is deeply committed to radiation protection. Multiple strategies work together to ensure patients receive only the radiation necessary for their diagnostic care. Understanding these protective measures can provide confidence in the safety of modern medical imaging.

The cornerstone of radiation protection is the ALARA principle - keeping radiation doses As Low As Reasonably Achievable while still achieving the diagnostic objective. This principle guides every decision in medical imaging, from equipment design to technique selection to quality assurance programs.

Modern technology reduces doses

Digital radiography systems have revolutionized medical imaging, significantly reducing radiation doses compared to older film-based technology. Digital detectors are more sensitive to radiation, meaning less radiation is needed to create high-quality images. Additionally, digital images can be optimized after acquisition, reducing the need for repeat exposures.

Newer CT scanners incorporate advanced technology including iterative reconstruction algorithms that produce clearer images with less radiation, automatic exposure control that adjusts radiation output based on patient size, and spectral imaging techniques that improve diagnostic capability while optimizing dose.

Technique optimization

Radiographers carefully select technique factors for each examination and patient. Settings are adjusted based on the body part being imaged, patient size, and the specific diagnostic question. This customization ensures each patient receives the appropriate radiation dose for their specific examination.

Beam collimation restricts the X-ray beam to only the area of clinical interest, reducing both the radiation dose and the amount of scattered radiation. Proper positioning ensures images are obtained correctly the first time, avoiding unnecessary repeat exposures.

Justification and optimization

Before any X-ray examination, healthcare providers must determine that the procedure is medically justified - meaning the expected diagnostic benefit outweighs any potential risk. Unnecessary or redundant examinations are avoided when possible, and alternative imaging methods (ultrasound, MRI) are considered when appropriate.

Quality assurance programs ensure X-ray equipment operates correctly and consistently. Regular calibration and testing verify that equipment delivers the expected radiation doses and image quality. Accreditation programs set standards for equipment, training, and procedures that facilities must meet.

Frequently asked questions about X-ray safety

Medical References and Sources

This article is based on current medical research and international guidelines. All claims are supported by scientific evidence from peer-reviewed sources.

  1. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007). "ICRP Publication 103: The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection." ICRP Publication 103 Foundation document for radiological protection worldwide. Evidence level: 1A
  2. World Health Organization (2023). "Ionizing Radiation, Health Effects and Protective Measures." WHO Fact Sheet Global guidance on radiation protection and health effects.
  3. American College of Radiology (2023). "ACR Practice Parameter for Imaging Pregnant or Potentially Pregnant Adolescents and Women with Ionizing Radiation." ACR Practice Parameters Guidelines for imaging during pregnancy.
  4. Image Gently Alliance. "Pause and Pulse: Optimizing Radiation Safety for Children in Fluoroscopy." Image Gently Pediatric radiation protection resources and guidelines.
  5. UNSCEAR (2021). "UNSCEAR 2020/2021 Report: Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation." UNSCEAR Reports United Nations scientific assessment of radiation effects.
  6. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007). "Computed tomography - an increasing source of radiation exposure." New England Journal of Medicine. 357(22):2277-84. Seminal paper on CT radiation and risk assessment.

Evidence grading: This article uses the GRADE framework (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) for evidence-based medicine. Evidence level 1A represents the highest quality of evidence, based on systematic reviews and extensive epidemiological studies.

⚕️

iMedic Medical Editorial Team

Specialists in radiology, medical physics and radiation safety

Our Editorial Team

iMedic's medical content is produced by a team of licensed specialist physicians and medical experts with solid academic background and clinical experience. Our editorial team includes:

Radiologists

Licensed physicians specializing in diagnostic radiology and medical imaging, with expertise in radiation safety and imaging protocols.

Medical Physicists

Experts in radiation dosimetry, equipment calibration, and radiation protection with published research in peer-reviewed journals.

Radiographers

Experienced imaging professionals with advanced training in patient positioning, dose optimization, and pediatric imaging techniques.

Medical Review

Independent review panel that verifies all content against international medical guidelines and current research.

Qualifications and Credentials
  • Licensed specialist physicians with international specialist competence
  • Members of RSNA (Radiological Society of North America) and ESR (European Society of Radiology)
  • Documented research background with publications in peer-reviewed journals
  • Continuous education according to ICRP, WHO and international medical guidelines
  • Follows the GRADE framework for evidence-based medicine

Transparency: Our team works according to strict editorial standards and follows international guidelines for medical information. All content undergoes multiple peer review before publication.

iMedic Editorial Standards

📋 Peer Review Process

All medical content is reviewed by at least two licensed specialist physicians before publication.

🔍 Fact-Checking

All medical claims are verified against peer-reviewed sources and international guidelines.

🔄 Update Frequency

Content is reviewed and updated at least every 12 months or when new research emerges.

✏️ Corrections Policy

Any errors are corrected immediately with transparent changelog. Read more

Medical Editorial Board: iMedic has an independent medical editorial board consisting of specialist physicians in radiology, medical physics, and radiation safety.