Dental Filling Materials: Types, Crowns & Bridges Guide
When you need dental treatment to repair or replace teeth, several different materials can be used depending on the size and location of the damage, your aesthetic preferences, and functional requirements. Understanding the properties, advantages, and limitations of each material helps you make informed decisions about your dental care in consultation with your dentist.
Quick Facts: Dental Materials
Key Takeaways
- Composite resin is the most popular filling material for visible teeth due to its natural tooth-colored appearance and ability to bond directly to tooth structure
- Glass ionomer releases fluoride and bonds well to teeth, making it ideal for areas prone to decay and for children's teeth
- Ceramic materials offer excellent aesthetics and durability for crowns and bridges, often lasting 15+ years with proper care
- Amalgam is no longer used in many countries due to environmental concerns about mercury, though existing fillings are generally safe
- Allergic reactions to dental materials are rare but possible; inform your dentist about any known allergies before treatment
- Material choice depends on location, size of restoration, aesthetic needs, and individual patient factors
- Regular dental checkups help monitor restorations and detect early signs of wear or failure
What Materials Are Used for Dental Fillings?
The main materials used for dental fillings are composite resin, glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer, and ceramics. Each material has specific properties that make it suitable for different clinical situations, with composite being the most versatile for both anterior and posterior teeth.
Dental materials, also known as restorative materials or dental biomaterials, encompass all substances used to repair, restore, or replace damaged or missing tooth structure. These materials have evolved significantly over the past several decades, with modern options offering improved aesthetics, durability, and biocompatibility compared to earlier materials. The choice of material depends on several factors, including the location and size of the cavity, functional requirements, aesthetic considerations, and patient preferences.
Understanding the properties of different dental materials helps patients make informed decisions about their treatment options. While your dentist will recommend the most appropriate material based on clinical assessment, having knowledge about available options enables meaningful discussions about your care. Modern dental materials undergo rigorous testing for safety and efficacy before being approved for clinical use, ensuring they meet international standards for biocompatibility and performance.
The field of dental materials science continues to advance, with researchers constantly developing new formulations that offer improved properties such as better wear resistance, enhanced aesthetics, and reduced technique sensitivity. This ongoing innovation means that today's dental restorations can provide excellent function and appearance while minimizing the risk of complications.
Types of Filling Materials
There are three primary categories of materials used for direct fillings - restorations placed and shaped directly in the mouth during a single appointment. These include composite resins, glass ionomers, and resin-modified glass ionomers. Each category has distinct characteristics that influence when and how they are used in clinical practice.
What Is Composite Resin and When Is It Used?
Composite resin is a tooth-colored plastic material that can be used for fillings of all sizes in both front and back teeth. It bonds directly to tooth structure, is cured with a special blue light, and provides excellent aesthetics by matching the color of natural teeth.
Composite resin has become the most widely used filling material in modern dentistry due to its excellent combination of aesthetics, versatility, and bonding properties. This material consists of a resin matrix (typically based on bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate or similar compounds) filled with glass or ceramic particles that provide strength and wear resistance. The result is a material that can be precisely matched to natural tooth color and shaped to restore the original form and function of damaged teeth.
The bonding mechanism of composite resin represents a significant advancement over traditional filling materials. Rather than simply being packed into a cavity, composite chemically and mechanically bonds to prepared tooth structure through an adhesive system. This bonding not only provides retention but also helps seal the interface between the filling and tooth, reducing the risk of bacterial infiltration and secondary decay. The technique requires careful attention to moisture control and proper application of the adhesive system for optimal results.
Nearly all modern composite materials are light-cured, meaning they remain workable until exposed to a specific wavelength of blue light (typically around 470 nanometers). This gives the dentist time to carefully shape the material before hardening it with a curing light. Multiple layers are often placed and cured individually to reduce shrinkage stress and ensure complete polymerization throughout the restoration. During this process, you may need to remain still with a cotton roll or rubber dam protecting the tooth from saliva contamination.
Composite resins come in various shades, translucencies, and viscosities to meet different clinical needs. Universal composites work well for most situations, while specialized products may be used for specific applications such as highly aesthetic anterior restorations or stress-bearing posterior teeth. Some modern composites also incorporate materials like nanofiller particles or special monomers that improve handling, reduce shrinkage, or enhance durability.
- Excellent aesthetics - available in multiple shades to match natural teeth
- Conservative preparation - bonds to tooth, preserving more natural structure
- Versatile - suitable for front and back teeth
- Can be repaired if damaged
- Does not contain mercury
How Does Glass Ionomer Work for Dental Fillings?
Glass ionomer cement is a material that chemically bonds to tooth structure and releases fluoride, making it particularly useful for fillings on tooth necks, areas prone to decay, and children's teeth. It is less sensitive to moisture than composite and offers good biocompatibility.
Glass ionomer cements (GICs) represent a unique class of dental materials that form a chemical bond with both enamel and dentin through an acid-base reaction. These materials consist of an acid-degradable fluoroaluminosilicate glass powder and an aqueous solution of polyacrylic acid. When mixed, the acid attacks the glass particles, releasing ions that crosslink the polyacid chains to form a solid matrix. This setting reaction occurs over several minutes, during which the material should be protected from moisture and premature loading.
One of the most significant advantages of glass ionomer is its ability to release fluoride over time. This sustained fluoride release creates an environment around the filling that inhibits bacterial growth and promotes remineralization of adjacent tooth structure. For patients at high risk of decay or those with poor oral hygiene, this property makes glass ionomer an excellent choice for certain applications. The material also takes up fluoride from external sources like toothpaste and mouthwash, creating a rechargeable fluoride reservoir.
Glass ionomer cements bond chemically to tooth structure through ionic exchange between the carboxyl groups of the polyacid and calcium ions in the tooth. This bonding mechanism is less sensitive to technique variations compared to composite bonding systems, making glass ionomer particularly forgiving in challenging clinical situations. The material also exhibits good biocompatibility with the dental pulp, making it suitable for use in deep cavities where the remaining dentin layer is thin.
However, traditional glass ionomer has limitations in terms of strength and wear resistance. It is generally not recommended for large restorations in areas subject to heavy chewing forces. Instead, it excels in applications such as cervical (neck) lesions, root surface fillings, core buildups under crowns, and pediatric dentistry. The material's lower aesthetic quality compared to composite also means it is typically reserved for less visible areas or situations where its other properties offer greater benefit.
What Is Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer?
Resin-modified glass ionomer combines the fluoride release and bonding properties of glass ionomer with added resin components for improved strength and light-curing capability. It sets quickly with blue light, offers better wear resistance than conventional glass ionomer, and works well for cervical fillings and children's molars.
Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) were developed to address some of the limitations of conventional glass ionomers while retaining their beneficial properties. These materials incorporate light-curable resin components into the traditional glass ionomer formulation, creating a hybrid that can be rapidly cured with a dental curing light while still undergoing the acid-base setting reaction that provides the characteristic properties of glass ionomer.
The dual-cure mechanism of RMGICs offers practical advantages in clinical use. The light-cured resin component provides immediate strength upon light exposure, allowing the restoration to be finished and polished in the same appointment without waiting for the acid-base reaction to complete. Meanwhile, the glass ionomer reaction continues over the following hours and days, contributing additional strength and enabling the material's fluoride release and chemical bonding capabilities.
Resin-modified glass ionomer exhibits significantly better mechanical properties than conventional glass ionomer, including improved flexural strength and wear resistance. However, it still does not match the strength and durability of composite resin for stress-bearing posterior restorations. The material is particularly well-suited for cervical lesions, where its combination of good bonding, fluoride release, and adequate strength meets clinical requirements effectively.
In pediatric dentistry, resin-modified glass ionomer has become a popular choice for restoring primary (baby) teeth. Its fluoride release helps protect teeth that are challenging to keep clean, while its adequate strength suffices for the relatively short lifespan of primary molars. The material's tolerance of slight moisture contamination also simplifies treatment of young patients who may have difficulty keeping still during procedures.
Why Is Amalgam No Longer Used?
Dental amalgam, which contains mercury, was once the most common filling material but is no longer used in many countries due to environmental concerns. While existing amalgam fillings are generally considered safe, new placements have been phased out in favor of mercury-free alternatives like composite and glass ionomer.
For over 150 years, dental amalgam was the standard material for posterior tooth restorations due to its excellent durability, ease of use, and low cost. Amalgam is an alloy of mercury with other metals, typically silver, tin, copper, and zinc. When mixed, the mercury reacts with the metal particles to form a hard, stable mass that can withstand the heavy forces generated during chewing. Many amalgam fillings have lasted 20-30 years or longer, demonstrating the material's exceptional longevity.
However, concerns about mercury's environmental impact have led to regulatory changes that have effectively ended amalgam use in many parts of the world. The Minamata Convention on Mercury, an international treaty to protect human health and the environment from mercury, specifically addresses dental amalgam. While the convention acknowledges that amalgam poses low risk to patients, it calls for a phase-down of amalgam use due to the broader environmental concerns associated with mercury in dental wastewater and cremation emissions.
From a patient health perspective, extensive research has found no evidence that dental amalgam causes systemic health problems in the general population. Major health organizations, including the World Health Organization, the American Dental Association, and the FDI World Dental Federation, have concluded that amalgam is a safe and effective filling material. The mercury in set amalgam is bound to the other metals and is not readily released in amounts that would pose health risks.
If you have existing amalgam fillings that are intact and not causing problems, there is generally no medical reason to have them removed and replaced. Removal procedures actually release more mercury temporarily than leaving the fillings in place. However, if an amalgam filling needs replacement due to decay or fracture, your dentist will use appropriate protocols to minimize mercury exposure and will typically replace it with a mercury-free material such as composite resin.
What Are Temporary Fillings Made Of?
Temporary fillings protect teeth between dental appointments and are made from materials designed to be easily removed. They typically consist of zinc oxide-eugenol cements or reinforced temporary materials that shield the tooth from sensitivity and bacteria until permanent restoration.
Temporary fillings serve an important role in dental treatment, providing interim protection for teeth that cannot be permanently restored in a single appointment. These situations include emergency treatment for pain relief, multi-visit root canal therapy, and cases where the permanent restoration requires laboratory fabrication. The ideal temporary filling material seals the tooth effectively against bacteria and temperature changes while remaining easy to remove when the time comes for definitive treatment.
Zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) cements are among the most commonly used temporary filling materials. These materials consist of zinc oxide powder mixed with eugenol (oil of cloves), forming a cement that sets through a chelation reaction. ZOE materials have a soothing effect on the dental pulp and provide a reasonable seal against bacterial infiltration. However, they have limited strength and can be easily dislodged by chewing, which is why patients are often advised to avoid eating on the treated side until permanent restoration.
Reinforced temporary filling materials contain additional components such as polymers or resins that improve strength and durability compared to plain ZOE cements. These materials can better withstand chewing forces during extended waiting periods and provide improved marginal seal. Some contemporary temporary materials are light-cured, offering immediate strength and allowing patients to eat sooner after placement.
Temporary or provisional crowns may be fabricated when a permanent crown is being made by a dental laboratory, a process that typically takes one to two weeks. These provisional crowns are usually made from acrylic resin or bis-acryl composite and are cemented with temporary cement that allows easy removal. While provisional crowns provide reasonable function and aesthetics during the waiting period, they require gentle care and avoidance of sticky or hard foods that could dislodge them.
What Materials Are Used for Crowns and Bridges?
Dental crowns and bridges are made from metals (titanium, cobalt-chromium, gold alloys), metal-ceramic combinations, or all-ceramic materials. The choice depends on location, aesthetic requirements, and functional demands, with ceramics offering the most natural appearance and metals providing maximum strength.
Crowns and bridges represent more extensive restorations than simple fillings, designed to replace significant amounts of lost tooth structure or to replace missing teeth entirely. A crown covers and protects the entire visible portion of a tooth, while a bridge spans the gap left by one or more missing teeth, using adjacent teeth as supports. The materials used for these restorations must withstand years of chewing forces while maintaining their integrity and appearance.
Metal alloys have a long history of use in crown and bridge construction due to their excellent mechanical properties. Titanium and cobalt-chromium alloys are commonly used for their combination of strength, biocompatibility, and cost-effectiveness. Gold alloys, while more expensive, offer excellent properties including precise fit, gentle wear against opposing teeth, and good longevity. The main limitation of metal restorations is their metallic appearance, which is generally considered unacceptable for visible teeth.
Metal-ceramic or porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) restorations combine the strength of a metal substructure with the aesthetics of an outer ceramic layer. The metal core provides structural support, while the ceramic veneer creates a natural tooth-like appearance. PFM restorations have been used successfully for decades and remain a viable option when maximum strength is required. However, the underlying metal can sometimes show as a dark line at the gum margin, particularly if gum recession occurs over time.
All-ceramic restorations have become increasingly popular as ceramic materials have improved in strength. Modern ceramics such as lithium disilicate and zirconia offer excellent aesthetics combined with adequate strength for most applications. Lithium disilicate is particularly favored for anterior teeth due to its lifelike translucency, while zirconia provides superior strength for posterior teeth and bridges. These materials can be milled using CAD/CAM (computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing) technology for precise fit and efficient fabrication.
| Material | Strength | Aesthetics | Typical Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metal (Gold/Cobalt-Chrome) | Excellent | Poor (metallic) | Back teeth, under other crowns |
| Metal-Ceramic (PFM) | Very Good | Good | Front and back teeth |
| Lithium Disilicate | Good | Excellent | Front teeth, veneers |
| Zirconia | Excellent | Very Good | Back teeth, bridges |
Ceramic Materials in Detail
All-ceramic crowns can be fabricated entirely from a single ceramic material or constructed with a strong ceramic core covered by a more translucent outer layer. The choice between monolithic (single-material) and layered constructions involves trade-offs between strength and aesthetics. Monolithic zirconia crowns offer maximum strength and can be made thinner than layered restorations, but may appear slightly more opaque. Layered constructions provide superior aesthetics but require more tooth reduction and are somewhat more prone to chipping of the outer layer.
The durability of ceramic restorations depends significantly on factors beyond the material itself. Proper tooth preparation, accurate impressions or digital scans, precise laboratory fabrication, and appropriate cementation technique all contribute to long-term success. With good care, ceramic crowns and bridges can easily last 10-15 years or more, with many lasting considerably longer. Regular dental checkups allow early detection of any problems before they become serious.
How Are Crowns and Bridges Attached?
Dental cement is used to attach crowns and bridges to prepared teeth. Different types include zinc phosphate, glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer, and composite resin cements, each suited to specific materials and clinical situations.
The cementation of crowns and bridges is a critical step that determines the long-term success of the restoration. Dental cement fills the microscopic gap between the prepared tooth and the restoration, providing retention and sealing against bacterial infiltration. The choice of cement depends on the restoration material, the amount of retention needed, and the condition of the underlying tooth structure.
Traditional zinc phosphate cement has been used for over a century and remains useful for metal and metal-ceramic restorations with good mechanical retention from their shape. This acid-base cement sets through a reaction between zinc oxide powder and phosphoric acid liquid, creating a strong but brittle cement that relies primarily on mechanical interlocking rather than chemical bonding.
Glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer cements offer the advantage of chemical bonding to tooth structure and fluoride release. These cements are often chosen for patients with high caries risk or when bonding to dentin is important. They provide good sealing and are less technique-sensitive than resin cements, making them reliable choices for routine cementation of metal and metal-ceramic restorations.
Composite resin cements, particularly adhesive resin cements, are required for all-ceramic restorations to achieve optimal bond strength. These cements create a strong bond between the ceramic restoration and tooth structure through a combination of chemical adhesion and micromechanical interlocking. The bonding process involves careful surface treatment of both the ceramic (typically with hydrofluoric acid and silane) and the tooth (with etch and adhesive), followed by precise placement and light curing of the cement.
What Materials Are Used in Root Canal Treatment?
Root canal filling materials seal the cleaned root canals to prevent bacterial regrowth. The most common material is gutta-percha, a rubber-like material used with a sealer cement to completely fill and seal the canal space, followed by a permanent restoration on top.
Root canal treatment involves removing infected or damaged pulp tissue from inside the tooth and filling the empty canal space with a biocompatible material. This treatment saves teeth that would otherwise need extraction and can provide many years of additional service with proper restoration. The success of root canal treatment depends largely on achieving a complete seal that prevents bacteria from recolonizing the canal system.
Gutta-percha has been the gold standard root filling material for over a century. This natural polymer, derived from the sap of certain tropical trees, has properties that make it ideal for root canal obturation. It is biocompatible, dimensionally stable, radiopaque (visible on X-rays), and can be compacted to adapt intimately to the canal walls. Gutta-percha is used in the form of cones that are fitted to the prepared canal and condensed using various techniques.
Gutta-percha alone cannot seal the canal completely due to its inability to bond to dentin. Therefore, it is used in combination with a root canal sealer that fills the spaces between gutta-percha cones and between the gutta-percha and canal walls. Modern sealers are typically based on zinc oxide-eugenol, calcium hydroxide, epoxy resin, or bioactive ceramics. Each type has advantages and limitations, and the choice depends on clinical factors and operator preference.
Following root canal treatment, the tooth requires a permanent restoration to seal the access opening and protect the remaining tooth structure. For posterior teeth, this typically means placement of a crown, as root-treated teeth become more brittle over time and are susceptible to fracture under chewing forces. Anterior teeth may sometimes be restored with composite fillings alone if sufficient tooth structure remains.
What Are Removable Dentures Made Of?
Removable dentures are made from acrylic resin for the gum-colored base and artificial teeth, with partial dentures incorporating a metal framework for strength. Modern options include flexible materials and implant-supported overdentures for improved stability.
Complete dentures replace all teeth in an arch and rest directly on the gum tissue and underlying bone. The base of a complete denture is made from heat-cured acrylic resin, a durable pink plastic that mimics the appearance of natural gum tissue. The artificial teeth attached to this base are typically made from acrylic or composite resin, though porcelain teeth were used historically and may still be specified for certain patients.
Partial dentures are used when some natural teeth remain in the arch. These prostheses typically have a metal framework made from cobalt-chromium alloy that provides strength and allows for a thinner, more comfortable design. The framework includes clasps that grip the remaining natural teeth to provide retention and stability. The metal framework is covered by acrylic resin in the areas that contact gum tissue and support artificial teeth.
Overdentures represent a significant advancement in denture design, using dental implants or retained tooth roots to improve stability and retention. Implant-supported overdentures snap onto attachments connected to implants placed in the jawbone, dramatically improving chewing efficiency and confidence compared to conventional dentures. This option is particularly valuable for patients who struggle with loose lower dentures, a common problem due to the natural resorption of the lower jawbone after tooth loss.
Flexible denture materials, such as thermoplastic nylons, offer an alternative to traditional rigid acrylic for partial dentures. These materials eliminate the need for metal clasps by using tooth-colored flexible extensions that engage undercut areas on natural teeth. While more aesthetically pleasing, flexible dentures may not be suitable for all situations and typically cannot be easily repaired or adjusted.
Can You Be Allergic to Dental Materials?
Allergic reactions to dental materials are rare but possible. Contact allergies to metals (especially nickel, cobalt, and chromium) are most common, causing redness, swelling, or white patches in the mouth. Reactions to composites or other materials are uncommon but can occur.
While dental materials undergo extensive biocompatibility testing before approval for clinical use, allergic reactions can occur in susceptible individuals. These reactions are almost always contact allergies (Type IV hypersensitivity), which develop over time through repeated exposure to the allergen. True immediate allergic reactions (Type I hypersensitivity) to dental materials are extremely rare.
Metal allergies are the most common type of reaction to dental materials. The metals most frequently implicated include nickel, cobalt, chromium, palladium, and gold. Symptoms typically appear in the mouth as redness, swelling, soreness, or white patches on the mucosa adjacent to the restoration. The reaction may develop months or even years after placement, as sensitization requires repeated exposure. Patients with known metal allergies, particularly nickel allergy (common in people who react to costume jewelry), should inform their dentist so alternative materials can be selected.
Allergic reactions to composite resins and other non-metallic dental materials are much less common but can occur. The resin monomers, particularly before complete polymerization, are potential sensitizers. Dental professionals who work with these materials daily are at higher risk than patients, who have only brief exposure during treatment. If an allergy to composite is suspected, alternative materials such as glass ionomer or ceramic restorations can be considered.
Eugenol, the active component in oil of cloves used in some dental cements and temporary materials, can cause contact allergic reactions. Patients who experience unusual reactions after receiving temporary fillings or certain types of cement should mention this to their dentist. Eugenol-free alternatives are available for most applications.
Contact your dentist if you experience persistent redness, swelling, soreness, or unusual sensations in your mouth after dental treatment. Your dentist may refer you to a dermatologist for patch testing to identify the specific allergen. Once identified, alternative materials can be selected for future treatment.
Symptoms of Contact Allergy
Contact allergies in the mouth may manifest as redness, swelling, soreness, or the development of white patches or lines on the oral mucosa (lichen planus-like reactions). The affected area is typically in direct contact with or close proximity to the suspected material. Symptoms usually develop gradually and may fluctuate in severity. Diagnosing oral mucosal reactions can be challenging because similar appearances can result from other conditions, making professional evaluation essential.
Is Dental Treatment Safe During Pregnancy?
Most dental treatments are safe during pregnancy, with the second trimester being the optimal time for elective procedures. Inform your dentist about your pregnancy so they can modify treatment as needed, such as using lead apron shields for X-rays and avoiding certain medications.
Maintaining good oral health during pregnancy is important because hormonal changes increase susceptibility to gum disease, which has been linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Routine dental care including cleanings, fillings, and crowns can and should continue during pregnancy. In fact, delaying necessary treatment may pose greater risks than the treatment itself.
When informing your dentist about pregnancy, they will consider several factors in planning your treatment. The second trimester (weeks 14-27) is generally considered the optimal time for elective dental procedures, as the first trimester is a critical period of fetal development and the third trimester may be uncomfortable due to positioning. However, urgent treatment should not be delayed regardless of trimester.
Dental X-rays are considered safe during pregnancy when appropriate shielding is used. Modern digital X-rays use very low radiation doses, and a lead apron with thyroid collar provides additional protection. Your dentist may modify their usual X-ray protocols or postpone routine X-rays until after delivery if immediate diagnostic imaging is not essential for your treatment.
Local anesthetics commonly used in dentistry, particularly lidocaine with epinephrine, are considered safe during pregnancy. These drugs have a long safety record and the benefits of pain-free treatment outweigh the minimal risks. However, certain medications such as some antibiotics and pain relievers may need to be avoided or substituted. Your dentist will consult with your obstetrician if questions arise about medication safety.
Frequently Asked Questions
The best dental filling material depends on several factors including the location and size of the cavity, your aesthetic preferences, and functional requirements. Composite resin is the most versatile option, suitable for both front and back teeth with excellent aesthetics. Glass ionomer is preferred for high-caries-risk patients and areas near the gum line due to its fluoride release. Ceramic restorations offer superior durability and aesthetics for crowns and bridges. Your dentist can recommend the most appropriate material based on your specific clinical situation and preferences.
The lifespan of dental fillings varies significantly by material and individual factors. Composite fillings typically last 5-10 years, while well-made ceramic restorations can last 10-15 years or longer. Factors affecting longevity include oral hygiene practices, grinding or clenching habits, the size and location of the filling, and the quality of the original placement. Regular dental checkups allow your dentist to monitor restorations and recommend replacement before problems develop.
Modern dental filling materials undergo extensive safety testing and are approved by regulatory agencies worldwide. Composite resins, glass ionomers, and ceramics have excellent biocompatibility. Allergic reactions are rare but possible, particularly to certain metals. Amalgam fillings containing mercury are no longer used in many countries due to environmental concerns, though existing fillings are generally considered safe. If you have concerns about specific materials, discuss them with your dentist who can explain the evidence and suggest alternatives if needed.
A filling repairs a portion of a damaged tooth by filling the cavity, while a crown covers and protects the entire visible portion of a tooth. Fillings are used for smaller cavities where most tooth structure remains intact. Crowns are recommended when significant tooth structure is lost, after root canal treatment, or to restore severely weakened teeth. Crowns are fabricated in a dental laboratory or with CAD/CAM technology and require preparation of the tooth to create space for the restoration.
If your amalgam fillings are intact and not causing problems, there is generally no medical reason to replace them. Major health organizations have concluded that amalgam is safe, and the removal process actually releases more mercury temporarily than leaving the fillings in place. However, if a filling is failing, has decay around it, or is causing other problems, replacement with a mercury-free material is appropriate. The decision should be made with your dentist based on clinical assessment rather than anxiety about mercury.
Yes, though rare, allergic reactions to dental materials can occur. Contact allergies to metals like nickel, cobalt, chromium, gold, and palladium are most common, typically manifesting as redness, swelling, or white patches in the mouth. Allergies to composite components or eugenol in temporary fillings are possible but uncommon. If you have known metal allergies or experience unusual reactions after dental treatment, inform your dentist so appropriate materials can be selected and you can be referred for testing if needed.
References & Sources
This article is based on current international dental guidelines and peer-reviewed research:
- American Dental Association (ADA) - Clinical Practice Guidelines on Restorative Materials, 2024
- FDI World Dental Federation - Policy Statement on Dental Amalgam and the Minamata Convention, 2022
- World Health Organization (WHO) - Oral Health Guidelines and Essential Medicines List, 2023
- Cochrane Oral Health Group - Systematic reviews on dental materials longevity and efficacy
- Journal of Dental Research - Meta-analyses on composite resin performance and ceramic restoration survival
- European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry - Guidelines for ceramic restorations, 2023
All medical claims follow the GRADE evidence framework. Content reviewed by licensed dental professionals.
About the Medical Editorial Team
This article was written and reviewed by the iMedic Medical Editorial Team, comprising licensed dental professionals and medical specialists with expertise in restorative dentistry, prosthodontics, and dental materials science.
Content reviewed by board-certified dental specialists following ADA and FDI guidelines
Level 1A evidence from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials
Last reviewed: November 7, 2025 | Next review scheduled: May 2026