Deucravacitinib (Sotyktu) 3-Year POETYK Extension Data: 69% Maintain PASI 75 with No Increased Infection or Malignancy Risk

Medically reviewed | Published: | Evidence level: 1A
Long-term open-label extension data from the POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 Phase 3 trials indicate that deucravacitinib (Sotyktu), the first selective TYK2 inhibitor approved for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, maintains robust efficacy with PASI 75 response sustained in approximately two-thirds of patients and PASI 90 in roughly 40% through three years of continuous treatment. Safety analysis across over 1,500 patients demonstrated no increased rates of serious infections, opportunistic infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), or venous thromboembolism — distinguishing deucravacitinib from JAK1/2/3 inhibitors that carry FDA-mandated boxed warnings for these risks.
📅 Published:
Reviewed by iMedic Medical Editorial Team
📄 Pharmacology

Quick Facts

PASI 75 at 3 Years
~69%
PASI 90 at 3 Years
~41%
Patient Cohort
Over 1,500 patients
Serious Infection Rate
Comparable to placebo period
Mechanism
Selective TYK2 inhibitor
Malignancy Signal
No increase vs background rates

What Is Deucravacitinib and Why Is Its Selectivity Important?

Quick answer: Deucravacitinib is the first oral selective TYK2 inhibitor, which blocks inflammatory signaling through IL-23, IL-12, and type I interferon pathways without inhibiting JAK1, JAK2, or JAK3 — avoiding the immunosuppressive and cardiovascular risks associated with broader JAK inhibition.

Deucravacitinib (brand name Sotyktu, developed by Bristol-Myers Squibb) represents a fundamentally different approach to Janus kinase pathway modulation. While earlier JAK inhibitors such as tofacitinib (Xeljanz), baricitinib (Olumiant), and upadacitinib (Rinvoq) block JAK1, JAK2, and/or JAK3, deucravacitinib exclusively inhibits tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) through an allosteric mechanism that binds the TYK2 pseudokinase (JH2) domain rather than the catalytic (JH1) domain. This unique binding mode provides over 100-fold selectivity for TYK2 versus JAK1, JAK2, and JAK3, which is critical because JAK1/2 inhibition is responsible for the immunosuppression, cytopenias, lipid elevations, and thromboembolic events that led the FDA to impose boxed warnings on tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib.

TYK2 specifically mediates signaling downstream of the IL-23, IL-12, and type I interferon receptors — three cytokine pathways centrally implicated in psoriasis pathogenesis. IL-23 drives the differentiation and expansion of pathogenic Th17 cells that produce IL-17A and IL-17F, the effector cytokines responsible for keratinocyte hyperproliferation and epidermal inflammation. IL-12 promotes Th1 cell differentiation and IFN-gamma production, contributing to the chronic inflammatory infiltrate. By selectively suppressing these pathways without broadly compromising host defense (which depends on JAK1/2-mediated IFN-gamma, IL-6, and hematopoietic cytokine signaling), deucravacitinib achieves targeted immunomodulation with a more favorable safety profile than pan-JAK inhibitors.

What Do the 3-Year POETYK Extension Results Show?

Quick answer: After approximately 156 weeks of continuous treatment, about two-thirds of patients maintained PASI 75 and roughly 40% maintained PASI 90, with efficacy plateauing by week 24 and remaining stable through year 3 without evidence of loss of response.

The POETYK long-term extension (LTE) enrolled patients who completed the 52-week POETYK PSO-1 or PSO-2 parent trials and continued open-label deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily for an additional two years (total approximately 156 weeks). Based on long-term extension data, PASI 75 was maintained by approximately 69% of patients, PASI 90 by roughly 41%, and complete clearance (PASI 100) by approximately 18% at the three-year mark. The static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) was achieved by a majority of patients continuing treatment.

Importantly, response rates appeared to plateau by approximately week 24 and remained stable through year 3, with no evidence of secondary loss of efficacy — a phenomenon sometimes observed with biologic therapies due to immunogenicity. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) improvements were also maintained, with a substantial proportion of patients reporting no impact on quality of life at three years. Among patients who had been randomized to placebo in the parent trials and switched to deucravacitinib at week 16 or 24, response rates at three years were comparable to those who received deucravacitinib from the outset, indicating full efficacy can be achieved regardless of delayed initiation.

How Does the Safety Profile Compare to TNF Inhibitors and IL-17/IL-23 Biologics?

Quick answer: Deucravacitinib's long-term safety profile showed serious infection and malignancy rates comparable to placebo-period background rates and favorable compared to TNF inhibitors, with no signal for the cardiovascular and thromboembolic risks seen with JAK1/2/3 inhibitors.

Cumulative safety analysis across the POETYK long-term extension demonstrated a reassuring profile. The rate of serious infections remained consistent with the rate observed during the placebo-controlled period and comparable to background rates in the psoriasis population. Notably, no significant signal for opportunistic infections, including herpes zoster requiring hospitalization or disseminated disease, was observed — a notable distinction from JAK1/2/3 inhibitors, where herpes zoster rates of 3–4 per 100 patient-years have been consistently documented in clinical trials. There were no reported cases of active tuberculosis.

Malignancy rates (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) remained consistent with age- and sex-matched population background rates and did not increase with longer exposure duration. MACE events and venous thromboembolism (DVT or PE) occurred at rates within background population expectations. These data stand in contrast to the ORAL Surveillance study of tofacitinib, which demonstrated increased rates of MACE and malignancy versus TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients aged 50 and older with cardiovascular risk factors, leading to the FDA boxed warning now applied to all JAK inhibitors.

Compared to injectable biologics commonly used in psoriasis, deucravacitinib's safety profile appears favorable. TNF inhibitors carry well-documented risks of serious infections (approximately 1.8–2.5 per 100 patient-years in registry data), demyelinating disease, and heart failure exacerbation. IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab) are associated with candidiasis and a theoretical concern regarding inflammatory bowel disease. IL-23 inhibitors (guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab) have excellent safety profiles but require injection and are generally more expensive. Deucravacitinib's oral route, once-daily dosing, and favorable safety data position it as an attractive first-line systemic option for patients preferring oral therapy over injection.

Who Is a Good Candidate for Deucravacitinib Treatment?

Quick answer: Deucravacitinib is best suited for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who prefer oral therapy, have cardiovascular risk factors that preclude JAK1/2/3 inhibitors, or have had inadequate response to traditional systemics like methotrexate.

The long-term data strengthen the evidence supporting deucravacitinib as a first-line oral systemic therapy for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The ideal candidate profile includes patients who prefer oral medication over injectable biologics, those with cardiovascular risk factors or a history of venous thromboembolism where JAK1/2/3 inhibitors would be contraindicated or high-risk, patients who have failed or cannot tolerate methotrexate or other conventional systemics (acitretin, cyclosporine, apremilast), and those seeking the convenience of once-daily dosing without the need for extensive laboratory monitoring.

The POETYK PSO-1 trial demonstrated deucravacitinib's superiority over apremilast (Otezla), the other oral systemic commonly used in psoriasis, with PASI 75 rates of approximately 53% versus 32% at week 16. For patients who require higher levels of skin clearance (PASI 90+), IL-23 inhibitors such as risankizumab (Skyrizi) and guselkumab (Tremfya) remain the most effective options, achieving PASI 90 rates in the range of 72–75% at one year in clinical trials. However, deucravacitinib's approximately 41% PASI 90 rate at three years is clinically meaningful and sufficient for a large proportion of patients. Contraindications include severe hepatic impairment, active serious infection, and concomitant use of strong immunosuppressants. Pregnancy is a contraindication based on preclinical data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on available evidence, deucravacitinib selectively inhibits TYK2 without affecting JAK1, JAK2, or JAK3. Long-term data show no increased rates of serious infections, malignancies, MACE, or venous thromboembolism — risks that led to FDA boxed warnings on JAK1/2/3 inhibitors like tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib.

Deucravacitinib's long-term PASI 75 of approximately 69% is comparable to some TNF inhibitors and exceeds apremilast. However, IL-23 inhibitors like risankizumab achieve higher clearance rates (PASI 90 in the range of 72–75% at one year). Deucravacitinib's advantage is oral once-daily dosing and no injection requirement.

Long-term data show no increased cardiovascular risk signal with deucravacitinib, with MACE rates within background population expectations. This is a key advantage over JAK1/2/3 inhibitors, which showed increased MACE in the ORAL Surveillance study of tofacitinib. Always consult your physician for personalized advice.

Long-term extension data from the POETYK trials showed stable PASI 75 response through three years with no evidence of secondary loss of efficacy. Response rates plateaued by approximately week 24 and remained consistent, unlike some biologic therapies where immunogenicity can reduce effectiveness over time.

The most common adverse events reported in clinical trials include upper respiratory infections, nasopharyngitis, headache, and acne. Serious adverse events are uncommon. Laboratory monitoring beyond periodic liver function tests is generally not required, though your prescriber will determine the appropriate monitoring schedule.

References

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb. Sotyktu (deucravacitinib) tablets: Full Prescribing Information. Princeton, NJ: BMS; 2022 (revised).
  2. Ytterberg SR, et al. Cardiovascular and cancer risk with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis (ORAL Surveillance). New England Journal of Medicine. 2022;386(4):316-326.
  3. Strober B, et al. Deucravacitinib versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: efficacy results from the 52-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 trial. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2023;88(1):29-39.
  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves deucravacitinib for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. FDA News Release. September 9, 2022.
  5. Armstrong AW, et al. Deucravacitinib versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: POETYK PSO-2 results. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2023;88(1):40-51.